As an upfront statement, I do not consider myself an angry person or someone who does not like people. Not at all. In fact it is the opposite. I was the other day doing my daily commute to the office and I started to think in all the things that “annoy” me when I am travelling through London. I started to laugh and decided to share it. This will be a fun post!
I have been living and working in London for about 9 years and I have a good idea of what it feels like when commuting between home and a job place: the rain, the cold, the overcrowd, the public transport delays (cancellations even worst)… One really get used to this lifestyle and assume these things as natural. But for some people it can get very stressful and seriously the main reason to change of life or even move away from busy London. I will dedicate this post for these people hoping to put a smile on them.
Let’s get started. These are the things my inner angry Londoner hate while commuting:
The Picnic
People eating their breakfast-lunch-dinner in a crowded bus or train. I am not saying people that sporadically had a complicated morning with no time to eat at home; I refer to the people that every day do this. Why I have to get your crumbs on me because you fell like your are on holiday eating outside?
The Dressing Table
Women putting on makeup. Let’s be straight here: why? I would probably pass the previous point as eating is essential for living, but makeup… And I would say you see this more often than people eating. I have encounter women actually throwing makeup powder in my shoulder. Even cut or file nails! that I found actually disgusting. For me is like if I stand in me middle of the bus, put down my trousers and take a dump… These things are personal hygiene and needs to be done in private.
The Morning Skunk
In general, weird and dirty smells in the morning. And we all know this is true… Who has not sit next to someone smelling like haven’t had a shower or wash the clothes in years? We all sweat and get dirty during the day. I do understand this to happen at the end of the day or in the commute back home. But at 7am? that’s a NO.
My Spot, My Kingdom
What about the people who does not move an inch even if they are blocking all possible way in or out of a bus or train? And this is worst when it is packed with people. They do not squeeze or move even if you ask them. And they look at you like if they are thinking: “I was here first, so back off!”. Come on, that rule does not apply when we are like sardines in a can. And what about when they even read the newspaper while standing in the middle hitting the pages in other people faces? Cannot you wait to read it in the street or in your office?
A special mention to those who lean on the vertical hand bar of the tube. Very few things are more selfish than this one. You try to grab a spot of the bar which is free and… do not dare to ask the person to move! They will look at you like if you are in life debt with them.
The Walking Library
People who read books (or watch videos in their mobile) while walking on the street or switching platforms. I would say this is almost a security concern. Many times I had to quickly jump aside because they do not care what is upfront. They just keep walking straight like a train no stopping because what they are reading is more important than their security (and security of others). It is selfish way of feeling more important that the others: “Step aside or die!”.
The Telephone Switchboard
People constantly speaking loudly on their phones. This one increases every year and you can find a variety of conversations: talking to their friends (if friends call me at 7am just for chatting, I will kill them), work phone calls (specially funny are the sales ones where they try to get business sitting between someone deeply sleeping and someone eating a smelly porridge). An the ones more annoyed: calls to services. There are people who wait to sit in a bus or train to call their Internet provider to complain screaming at them… why?
The Walking Office
People hitting their laptop’s keyboard like if they are already in the office. I understand you want to get on mood to work and seize time; but do you need to write the Bible in a super-fast mode when you are commuting? The quickest and loudest, the better. Sometimes this one can be combined with the previous one and having a fully capable office while they travel. Is this a bad thing? No, but I found it funny.
I hope you enjoyed this post. Sometimes life can be stressful and it is better to laugh at these things. Just problems from the first world.
Launch date: July 16, 1969 Landing date: July 24, 1969
And the day has come. History is watching. The effort of hundred thousands of people and the dreams of other millions rest on one single mission, on three man.
On July 20, 1969, an ancient dream was about to be fulfilled as Commander Neil Armstrong and his right-hand man, Buzz Aldrin, descended towards the first manned touchdown on the Moon. Beginning at about 35,000 feet (10,670 m) above the surface, a series of alarming warning on Eagle’s computer set everyone on edge…
“Program alarm”, said Armstrong. “1202”.
At mission control in Houston, a 26-year-old Steve Bales was sitting at the Guidance console, monitoring Eagle’s systems via remote telemetry. Another code, 1201, also came out. “What’s a 1201?”, the senior flight controller asked. Bales needed a few seconds to think, but Eagle’s crew needed an immediate answer. Should they abort the landing? Bales had not time left for thinking. Making the bravest decision of his life, he spoke into his headset for all mission controllers to hear. “We’re ‘Go’ on the alarm”. This meant, astronauts to carry on with their descent. Then Eagle started its way to the surface. Bales had recalled similar alarms showing up during one of the many trainings simulations, and he thought that it was not a threat to the mission.
Just as Bales was recovering, Charlie Duke, CapCom at that moment, radioed a warning up to Eagle’s crew. “You only have 60 seconds-worth of fuel remaining”. Unsure whether the astronauts had got the message, he called out another warning. “Thirty seconds”. Chief astronaut Deke Slayton, standing behind Duke, said softly to him, “Shut up, Charlie, and let ’em land”.
With less than a hundred feet remaining before touchdown, Eagle apparently was pitching forward at a very steep angle and skimming over the ground at 30 miles (48 km) per hour. Had the astronauts lost control of their ship?
At last, Aldrin radioed, “Contact light. Mode control to auto. Engine arm off”. Those were the first words spoken by a human on another world. Sadly for Aldrin, we prefer to remember Armstrong’s words a few moments later. “Houston, Tranquility Base here. The Eagle has landed”.
A fascinating reply from Duke seems not to have been much remarked on at the time. “Roger, Tranquility, we copy you on the ground. You got a bunch of guys about to turn blue. We’re breathing again. Thanks a lot”.
Later Armstrong explained what happened on those last seconds before touchdown. The Eagle’s guidance computer was taking them right into a crater with a large number of holes and rocks. He had to manually nudge Eagle forward to hover a few feet over the surface until he could find a safe place to land.
But what really made this safe landing was something more genius: the 1201/1202 sequence alarms. This was the “kill and recompute from a safe place” restart approach of the revolutionary software running in the Eagle’s guidance computer. Just seconds before the alarms triggered, the computer was overloaded with interrupts caused by incorrectly phased power supplied to the lander’s rendezvous radar. These 1201/1202 alarms indicated “executive overflows”, meaning the guidance computer could not complete all of its tasks in real time and had to postpone some of them.
The priority alarm displays interrupted the astronauts’ normal displays to warn them that there was an emergency “giving the astronauts a go/no go decision (to land or not to land)”. Steve Bales knew the astronauts were seeing these alarms and that is why he shouted the GO to land. This might sound obvious nowadays, but back on 1969 the software development was at its earliest stages and to create a code smart enough to recognize which tasks are more critical than others, reorder them and execute them was nearly science fiction.
The brain behind this was a 33-year-old woman Margaret Hamilton; pioneer in software engineering (a term which was coined by her) and her work is a fundamental part to understand how software is develop today. She and other women that time were key in programming. Another example was Grace Hopper, inventor of COBOL programming language, US Navy rear admiral and also remembered by coining the term debug after finding out that one of her lab’s computer was malfunctioning because a moth.
Margaret Hamilton standing next to listings of the software she and her team produced for the Apollo project
Hamilton later wrote of the incident with the landing of Apollo 11 and describes perfectly the importance of her software:
The computer (or rather the software in it) was smart enough to recognize that it was being asked to perform more tasks than it should be performing. It then sent out an alarm, which meant to the astronaut, ‘I’m overloaded with more tasks than I should be doing at this time and I’m going to keep only the more important tasks’; i.e., the ones needed for landing … Actually, the computer was programmed to do more than recognize error conditions. A complete set of recovery programs was incorporated into the software. The software’s action, in this case, was to eliminate lower priority tasks and re-establish the more important ones … If the computer hadn’t recognized this problem and taken recovery action, I doubt if Apollo 11 would have been the successful moon landing it was.
Margaret Hamilton
Armstrong and Aldrin tried to rest, but they were too keyed up to sleep. After two hours of preparations for the EVA, the Eagle was depressurized, hatch opened and Armstrong began his descent to the lunar surface. Once he jumped into the surface, the whole world heard his words:
That’s one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind
19 minutes later it was the turn of Aldrin to step out of the Eagle. His first impression was to take a picture of his first step in the Moon; the bootprint picture we all remember. Both astronauts began the multiple surface operations: mount the TV cameras, collect soil and rock samples, experimental walkthrough the surface, deploy seismic experiment device to measure moonquakes and a retroreflector used for the Laser Ranging experiment to measure the exact distance between Moon and Earth for the first time.
After 21 and a half hours, the Eagle lifted off lunar surface to rejoin Collins onboard of the Columbia module in lunar orbit and being the journey back to Earth. Apollo 11 splashed down in the Pacific Ocean on 24 July 1969 at 16:50:35 UTC at 400 miles of Wake Island and 24 km (15 mi) from the recovery ship USS Hornet. The performance of the spacecraft was excellent throughout the mission. The primary mission goal of landing astronauts on the Moon and returning them to Earth was achieved. Armstrong was a civilian on his second spaceflight (he’d previously flown on Gemini 8), Aldrin was a USAF Colonel on his second spaceflight (Gemini 12), Collins was a USAF Lt. Colonel also on his second flight (Gemini 10).
Finally the ancient dream was accomplished. The primary goal of the Gemini and Apollo projects was achieved flawlessly and within deadlines. The immense hard work of thousand of men and women was finally recognized and inserted in a memorable place in human history. The legacy of this shows what humans can achieve if we really focus. When the society falls to its darkest stage or we only see horrendous actions, examples like this must be present with all of us and poke our lives; continue growing as species and look up to these bright moments which are the ones pushing us forward.
But this must be just the beginning. We need to set our next goal to push further our boundaries, our next giant leap. Is it Mars? is it Titan? Predictions says it would be the red planet but we must go back to the Moon first. There is much more to discover and study over there to understand the early stages of our planet and solar system. I believe humans will need to leave Earth and make a new home on another planet. In the next 100 years we will embark in our greatest ever adventure and a stablished crew on the Moon will be the real first step: our destiny is in the stars.
Neil A. Armstrong – Michael Collins – Edwin “Buzz” E. Aldrin Jr.
https://www.eretit.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/apollo_50th_full_color_72dpi.png9341500SumotaYhttps://www.eretit.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Logo_wd.pngSumotaY2019-07-20 09:00:272019-07-20 12:00:10Apollo 11 - The Big Leap
Muy de vez en cuando, menos de lo que me gustaría, me dejo imbuir por obras pictóricas de grandes autores clásicos. Me fascina que existan genios capaces de plasmar tanto mensaje en una sola imagen. Realmente creo que el arte, especialmente el pictórico, es algo tan innato en muestro ser como especie que independientemente del bagaje cultural del artista (o espectador) y de la época en que se crea (o se contempla) el mensaje es siempre directo, claro y con fuerza. Al fin y al cabo fue la pintura la primera muestra de arte del ser humano, la primera muestra de ese “salto” a lo que somos hoy.
Especialmente me atraen obras que expresan temas sobrenaturales, de misterio y religiosas. Creo que son las que mejor transmiten lo que el autor quiere expresar y las que más impacto deja al observador a los pocos minutos de contemplar la obra.
Estaba buscando y re-visitando varios autores cuando me encontré con esta maravilla: El Ángel caído (1847) de Alexandre Cabanel.
Haced click en la foto al título de este post para ver la obra entera. Merece la pena. En ella vemos un ejemplo de realismo (género pictórico del autor) del mismo Lucifer. Vemos su figura como un análisis anatómico perfecto (marcando cada uno de los músculos) y el espectacular colorido que inunda el primer plano. Todo ello en una escena de fondo donde vemos la Gran Batalla en los Cielos (Apocalipsis, 12) donde un ejercito de ángeles rebeldes son derrotados por el arcángel San Miguel y sus súbditos.
Pero lo interesante de la obra y lo que más me ha impactado es la mirada de Lucifer. Esa expresión de dolor, ira y venganza profundos hacia su creador.
Cuando observé la obra por primera vez, toda la escena del fondo y el colorido del primer plano me hizo fijarme directamente en la mirada. Y al fijarme detenidamente lo ví claro. El mensaje, la razón del ser de la obra era justo lo que estaba sintiendo. La ira y venganza generada por el dolor en estado puro.
Lucifer llegó a ser el gran favorito, la mano derecha de Dios. El más inteligente, hermoso y luminoso de los arcángeles. Pero tenia un defecto: la soberbia. Y esto le llevó a creerse igual a Dios y rebelarse; cosa que no acabó bien.
Y es que en verdad me sorprende la fuerza que estas obras transmiten. Cuando me sumerjo en ellas siempre descubro cosas nuevas. Matices que de primeras se escapan pero que cuando vuelvo a ellas descubro que son lo más importante de la obra. Lo que conecta con lo más profundo de nuestro ser y, como un resorte, nos activa esa esencia que nos hace humanos.
¡Cómo has caído de los cielos, Lucero, hijo de la Aurora!
¡Has sido abatido a la tierra dominador de naciones!
Tú que dijiste: Al cielo subiré, por encima de las estrellas de Dios alzaré mi trono. Subiré a las alturas del nublado, y seré como el Altísimo.
https://www.eretit.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/the-fallen-angel-by-alexandre-cabanel-1847.jpg6381000SumotaYhttps://www.eretit.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Logo_wd.pngSumotaY2019-06-29 01:14:552019-06-29 01:34:49Ira en estado puro
Inner angry Londoner
As an upfront statement, I do not consider myself an angry person or someone who does not like people. Not at all. In fact it is the opposite. I was the other day doing my daily commute to the office and I started to think in all the things that “annoy” me when I am travelling through London. I started to laugh and decided to share it. This will be a fun post!
I have been living and working in London for about 9 years and I have a good idea of what it feels like when commuting between home and a job place: the rain, the cold, the overcrowd, the public transport delays (cancellations even worst)… One really get used to this lifestyle and assume these things as natural. But for some people it can get very stressful and seriously the main reason to change of life or even move away from busy London. I will dedicate this post for these people hoping to put a smile on them.
Let’s get started. These are the things my inner angry Londoner hate while commuting:
The Picnic
People eating their breakfast-lunch-dinner in a crowded bus or train. I am not saying people that sporadically had a complicated morning with no time to eat at home; I refer to the people that every day do this. Why I have to get your crumbs on me because you fell like your are on holiday eating outside?
The Dressing Table
Women putting on makeup. Let’s be straight here: why? I would probably pass the previous point as eating is essential for living, but makeup… And I would say you see this more often than people eating. I have encounter women actually throwing makeup powder in my shoulder. Even cut or file nails! that I found actually disgusting. For me is like if I stand in me middle of the bus, put down my trousers and take a dump… These things are personal hygiene and needs to be done in private.
The Morning Skunk
In general, weird and dirty smells in the morning. And we all know this is true… Who has not sit next to someone smelling like haven’t had a shower or wash the clothes in years? We all sweat and get dirty during the day. I do understand this to happen at the end of the day or in the commute back home. But at 7am? that’s a NO.
My Spot, My Kingdom
What about the people who does not move an inch even if they are blocking all possible way in or out of a bus or train? And this is worst when it is packed with people. They do not squeeze or move even if you ask them. And they look at you like if they are thinking: “I was here first, so back off!”. Come on, that rule does not apply when we are like sardines in a can. And what about when they even read the newspaper while standing in the middle hitting the pages in other people faces? Cannot you wait to read it in the street or in your office?
A special mention to those who lean on the vertical hand bar of the tube. Very few things are more selfish than this one. You try to grab a spot of the bar which is free and… do not dare to ask the person to move! They will look at you like if you are in life debt with them.
The Walking Library
People who read books (or watch videos in their mobile) while walking on the street or switching platforms. I would say this is almost a security concern. Many times I had to quickly jump aside because they do not care what is upfront. They just keep walking straight like a train no stopping because what they are reading is more important than their security (and security of others). It is selfish way of feeling more important that the others: “Step aside or die!”.
The Telephone Switchboard
People constantly speaking loudly on their phones. This one increases every year and you can find a variety of conversations: talking to their friends (if friends call me at 7am just for chatting, I will kill them), work phone calls (specially funny are the sales ones where they try to get business sitting between someone deeply sleeping and someone eating a smelly porridge). An the ones more annoyed: calls to services. There are people who wait to sit in a bus or train to call their Internet provider to complain screaming at them… why?
The Walking Office
People hitting their laptop’s keyboard like if they are already in the office. I understand you want to get on mood to work and seize time; but do you need to write the Bible in a super-fast mode when you are commuting? The quickest and loudest, the better. Sometimes this one can be combined with the previous one and having a fully capable office while they travel. Is this a bad thing? No, but I found it funny.
I hope you enjoyed this post. Sometimes life can be stressful and it is better to laugh at these things. Just problems from the first world.
Apollo 11 – The Big Leap
Launch date: July 16, 1969
Landing date: July 24, 1969
And the day has come. History is watching. The effort of hundred thousands of people and the dreams of other millions rest on one single mission, on three man.
On July 20, 1969, an ancient dream was about to be fulfilled as Commander Neil Armstrong and his right-hand man, Buzz Aldrin, descended towards the first manned touchdown on the Moon. Beginning at about 35,000 feet (10,670 m) above the surface, a series of alarming warning on Eagle’s computer set everyone on edge…
“Program alarm”, said Armstrong. “1202”.
At mission control in Houston, a 26-year-old Steve Bales was sitting at the Guidance console, monitoring Eagle’s systems via remote telemetry. Another code, 1201, also came out. “What’s a 1201?”, the senior flight controller asked. Bales needed a few seconds to think, but Eagle’s crew needed an immediate answer. Should they abort the landing? Bales had not time left for thinking. Making the bravest decision of his life, he spoke into his headset for all mission controllers to hear. “We’re ‘Go’ on the alarm”. This meant, astronauts to carry on with their descent. Then Eagle started its way to the surface. Bales had recalled similar alarms showing up during one of the many trainings simulations, and he thought that it was not a threat to the mission.
Just as Bales was recovering, Charlie Duke, CapCom at that moment, radioed a warning up to Eagle’s crew. “You only have 60 seconds-worth of fuel remaining”. Unsure whether the astronauts had got the message, he called out another warning. “Thirty seconds”. Chief astronaut Deke Slayton, standing behind Duke, said softly to him, “Shut up, Charlie, and let ’em land”.
With less than a hundred feet remaining before touchdown, Eagle apparently was pitching forward at a very steep angle and skimming over the ground at 30 miles (48 km) per hour. Had the astronauts lost control of their ship?
At last, Aldrin radioed, “Contact light. Mode control to auto. Engine arm off”. Those were the first words spoken by a human on another world. Sadly for Aldrin, we prefer to remember Armstrong’s words a few moments later. “Houston, Tranquility Base here. The Eagle has landed”.
A fascinating reply from Duke seems not to have been much remarked on at the time. “Roger, Tranquility, we copy you on the ground. You got a bunch of guys about to turn blue. We’re breathing again. Thanks a lot”.
Later Armstrong explained what happened on those last seconds before touchdown. The Eagle’s guidance computer was taking them right into a crater with a large number of holes and rocks. He had to manually nudge Eagle forward to hover a few feet over the surface until he could find a safe place to land.
But what really made this safe landing was something more genius: the 1201/1202 sequence alarms. This was the “kill and recompute from a safe place” restart approach of the revolutionary software running in the Eagle’s guidance computer. Just seconds before the alarms triggered, the computer was overloaded with interrupts caused by incorrectly phased power supplied to the lander’s rendezvous radar. These 1201/1202 alarms indicated “executive overflows”, meaning the guidance computer could not complete all of its tasks in real time and had to postpone some of them.
The priority alarm displays interrupted the astronauts’ normal displays to warn them that there was an emergency “giving the astronauts a go/no go decision (to land or not to land)”. Steve Bales knew the astronauts were seeing these alarms and that is why he shouted the GO to land. This might sound obvious nowadays, but back on 1969 the software development was at its earliest stages and to create a code smart enough to recognize which tasks are more critical than others, reorder them and execute them was nearly science fiction.
The brain behind this was a 33-year-old woman Margaret Hamilton; pioneer in software engineering (a term which was coined by her) and her work is a fundamental part to understand how software is develop today. She and other women that time were key in programming. Another example was Grace Hopper, inventor of COBOL programming language, US Navy rear admiral and also remembered by coining the term debug after finding out that one of her lab’s computer was malfunctioning because a moth.
Hamilton later wrote of the incident with the landing of Apollo 11 and describes perfectly the importance of her software:
Armstrong and Aldrin tried to rest, but they were too keyed up to sleep. After two hours of preparations for the EVA, the Eagle was depressurized, hatch opened and Armstrong began his descent to the lunar surface. Once he jumped into the surface, the whole world heard his words:
19 minutes later it was the turn of Aldrin to step out of the Eagle. His first impression was to take a picture of his first step in the Moon; the bootprint picture we all remember. Both astronauts began the multiple surface operations: mount the TV cameras, collect soil and rock samples, experimental walkthrough the surface, deploy seismic experiment device to measure moonquakes and a retroreflector used for the Laser Ranging experiment to measure the exact distance between Moon and Earth for the first time.
After 21 and a half hours, the Eagle lifted off lunar surface to rejoin Collins onboard of the Columbia module in lunar orbit and being the journey back to Earth. Apollo 11 splashed down in the Pacific Ocean on 24 July 1969 at 16:50:35 UTC at 400 miles of Wake Island and 24 km (15 mi) from the recovery ship USS Hornet. The performance of the spacecraft was excellent throughout the mission. The primary mission goal of landing astronauts on the Moon and returning them to Earth was achieved. Armstrong was a civilian on his second spaceflight (he’d previously flown on Gemini 8), Aldrin was a USAF Colonel on his second spaceflight (Gemini 12), Collins was a USAF Lt. Colonel also on his second flight (Gemini 10).
Finally the ancient dream was accomplished. The primary goal of the Gemini and Apollo projects was achieved flawlessly and within deadlines. The immense hard work of thousand of men and women was finally recognized and inserted in a memorable place in human history. The legacy of this shows what humans can achieve if we really focus. When the society falls to its darkest stage or we only see horrendous actions, examples like this must be present with all of us and poke our lives; continue growing as species and look up to these bright moments which are the ones pushing us forward.
But this must be just the beginning. We need to set our next goal to push further our boundaries, our next giant leap. Is it Mars? is it Titan? Predictions says it would be the red planet but we must go back to the Moon first. There is much more to discover and study over there to understand the early stages of our planet and solar system. I believe humans will need to leave Earth and make a new home on another planet. In the next 100 years we will embark in our greatest ever adventure and a stablished crew on the Moon will be the real first step: our destiny is in the stars.
Crew
Mission Insignia
Ira en estado puro
Muy de vez en cuando, menos de lo que me gustaría, me dejo imbuir por obras pictóricas de grandes autores clásicos. Me fascina que existan genios capaces de plasmar tanto mensaje en una sola imagen. Realmente creo que el arte, especialmente el pictórico, es algo tan innato en muestro ser como especie que independientemente del bagaje cultural del artista (o espectador) y de la época en que se crea (o se contempla) el mensaje es siempre directo, claro y con fuerza. Al fin y al cabo fue la pintura la primera muestra de arte del ser humano, la primera muestra de ese “salto” a lo que somos hoy.
Especialmente me atraen obras que expresan temas sobrenaturales, de misterio y religiosas. Creo que son las que mejor transmiten lo que el autor quiere expresar y las que más impacto deja al observador a los pocos minutos de contemplar la obra.
Estaba buscando y re-visitando varios autores cuando me encontré con esta maravilla: El Ángel caído (1847) de Alexandre Cabanel.
Haced click en la foto al título de este post para ver la obra entera. Merece la pena. En ella vemos un ejemplo de realismo (género pictórico del autor) del mismo Lucifer. Vemos su figura como un análisis anatómico perfecto (marcando cada uno de los músculos) y el espectacular colorido que inunda el primer plano. Todo ello en una escena de fondo donde vemos la Gran Batalla en los Cielos (Apocalipsis, 12) donde un ejercito de ángeles rebeldes son derrotados por el arcángel San Miguel y sus súbditos.
Pero lo interesante de la obra y lo que más me ha impactado es la mirada de Lucifer. Esa expresión de dolor, ira y venganza profundos hacia su creador.
Cuando observé la obra por primera vez, toda la escena del fondo y el colorido del primer plano me hizo fijarme directamente en la mirada. Y al fijarme detenidamente lo ví claro. El mensaje, la razón del ser de la obra era justo lo que estaba sintiendo. La ira y venganza generada por el dolor en estado puro.
Lucifer llegó a ser el gran favorito, la mano derecha de Dios. El más inteligente, hermoso y luminoso de los arcángeles. Pero tenia un defecto: la soberbia. Y esto le llevó a creerse igual a Dios y rebelarse; cosa que no acabó bien.
Y es que en verdad me sorprende la fuerza que estas obras transmiten. Cuando me sumerjo en ellas siempre descubro cosas nuevas. Matices que de primeras se escapan pero que cuando vuelvo a ellas descubro que son lo más importante de la obra. Lo que conecta con lo más profundo de nuestro ser y, como un resorte, nos activa esa esencia que nos hace humanos.